Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +8208%
39.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
60
192
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
AD103
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy