Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
2
28
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
VSA-101
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
180 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy