Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
2
28
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
VSA-101
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
180 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy