Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +648%
2.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
112
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU117
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy