Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Radeon E9390 PCIe +1167%
3.903 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 200M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
713 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.85 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.903 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.903 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy