Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +691%
2.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce 200M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Vega 12
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy