Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +870%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Amethyst
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy