Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
9616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation +13260%
41.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
76
112
Shading Units
9728
56
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
AD103
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy