Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +332%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy