Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 +4%
0.674 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy