Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +525%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
220W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy