Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +1122%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
36
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
TU106
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy