Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +558%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy