NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
16144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI350X
+10082%
72.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
256
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
16384
80
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
1000W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
CDNA Next
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
185 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
