Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 +60%
0.708 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

204W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R600
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy