Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +2723%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 33
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy