Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +238%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1440
80
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cypress
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy