Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (106W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
106W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF106
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy