Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8100 +1703%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy