Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +458%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy