Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +1864%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
3840
56
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
384 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy