Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +108%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy