Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +202%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
7
SM Count
14
336
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.814 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
39.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
941.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
78.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
TU106
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy