Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +180%
1.078 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
200W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
R600
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy