Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (375W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +1207%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
475W
750 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Vega 20
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy