CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+236%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
40
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU116
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Board Design
210W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy