NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1725MHz vs 1032MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (100W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

1.585 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +178%

4.416 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

111

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +425%

583

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

23

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +304%

93

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Mar 2013

Release Date

Nov 2019

GeForce 600

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz

Base Clock

1530 MHz

1032 MHz

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

192bit

Memory Bus

128bit

144.2GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

20

-

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

1280

64

TMUs

80

24

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

384 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.51 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

66.05 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

1.585 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

66.05 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106

GPU Name

TU116

GK106-240-A1

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

Kepler

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

2.54 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

221 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

134W

TDP

100W

300 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

1.3

3.0

CUDA

7.5

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

5

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA A2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 4720

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance