Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
1.425 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +742%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy