CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
+1138%
1.981 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
64
80
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
82.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.981 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
82.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
140W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5530
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy