Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
744 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 +269%
1.981 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
960
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
82.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.981 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
82.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy