CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W9000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W9000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
AMD FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Lower TDP (195W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3.25 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
+22%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
VS
FirePro W9000
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Tahiti
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
195W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6300
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V7750
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 315
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA P102 100
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 4860
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8510 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy