CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
+506%
3.25 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
216
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT200
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
195W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
4
AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
6
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy