Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690 +404%
3.13 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
400
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
69W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Redwood
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy