Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +781%
1.269 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy