Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +46%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy