Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock1239MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +30%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy