NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1695MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+212%
4.339 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
98
A16 PCIe
+420%
510
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 700
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
640
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA107
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
