Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2000MHz vs 1046MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
2.812 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +9%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 700
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
211.2GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
117.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.812 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
117.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy