Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
1072 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 +2377%
2.378 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4350 AGP
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
10.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
80
96
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

170W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV710
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy