Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock863MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M +2662%
1.326 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 700M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
863 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
RV610
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy