Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +675%
4.156 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
192
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT200
GK110-301-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy