Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (925MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +75%
4.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Curacao
GK110-301-B1
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy