Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
4.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +35%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
176
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
580W
600 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK110-300-B1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy