NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (2130MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+124%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
2880
Shading Units
2816
240
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
AD107
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
