Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireGL V3600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +1169%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV630
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy