Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireGL V8600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +315%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
R600
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy