Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +4470%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV620
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy