Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1190MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +320%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Oland
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy