Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +138%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy