NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1967MHz vs 1190MHz)

More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

1.828 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo +726%

15.11 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

179

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo +733%

1492

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

VS

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Graphics Card

Mar 2016

Release Date

Aug 2021

GeForce 900

Generation

Radeon Pro Mac

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz

Base Clock

1800 MHz

1190 MHz

Boost Clock

1967 MHz

1653 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

32GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

105.8GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

60

-

768

Shading Units

3840

48

TMUs

240

32

ROPs

96

-

RT Cores

60

48 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

L3 Cache

128 MB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

188.8 GPixel/s

57.12 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

472.1 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

30.21 TFLOPS

1.828 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

15.11 TFLOPS

57.12 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

944.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W

TDP

400W

250 W

Suggested PSU

800 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GM206

GPU Name

Navi 21

GM206-251-A1

GPU Variant

Navi 21 Pro-XLA

Maxwell 2.0

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

7 nm

2.94 billion

Transistors

26.8 billion

228 mm²

Die Size

520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.2

CUDA

-

6.4

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon RX 6700

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 3470

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R7 240

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

Related News

1

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

2

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

3

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

4

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

5

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

6

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

7

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

8

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

9

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

10

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers